Dutch Government Sued by Airlines Over Amsterdam Schiphol Flight Cap
KLM, Delta, easyJet, and others are planning to take legal action against the Dutch government's decision to cut flight numbers at the airport due to noise and pollution
A group of airlines is planning to take legal action against the Dutch government over the decision to cut the number of flights at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AMS) due to pollution.
The group filing the lawsuit is headed by the Dutch flag carrier KLM and comprises Delta Air Lines, easyJet, Corendon, and TUI.
The airlines have decided to take legal action against the Dutch government, who have cut the number of flights at Schiphol—the biggest airport in the Netherlands and one of the busiest in Europe—from 500,000 to just 460,000 each year.
Meanwhile, the International Air Transport Association (IATA), a trade organization representing airlines worldwide, also announced on Friday that it was planning to sue the Dutch government over the same issue.
Photo: Amsterdam-Schiphol. Courtesy of Roger Cremers
Last year, the Netherlands government decided to drastically reduce the number of flights in and out of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, as it was claiming to seek a ‘new balance’ between the economic benefits of the airport and the environmental impact on local residents. It is hoped that reducing the number of flights would significantly reduce noise and air pollution in the local area.
However, the group of airlines is arguing that the decision to cut flights violates both European and international legislation and that its members have already invested billions of dollars to meet its own goals of reducing CO2 emissions and noise levels.
“The airlines are challenging the government’s unilateral decision to significantly cut flight movements at Schiphol, confident they can reduce noise levels and CO2 emissions while maintaining a network of destinations for the millions of passengers and tonnes of cargo they carry annually to and from Schiphol,” said the airline group in a statement.
“The airlines have already made multi-billion euros investments to meet near- and long-term goals in line with their own decarbonization trajectories as well as government policies, while the government’s justification hinges on operational restrictions with no consideration of alternative workable solutions to effect noise reduction.”
Photo: Amsterdam Schiphol Airport. Courtesy of Rita Candeias / Unsplash
In addition to harming the airlines’ operations and the economy of the Netherlands, the group also claimed that the Dutch government’s decision to reduce the number of flights at Schiphol would also be detrimental to passengers.
“In addition to negatively impacting the Dutch economy, the capacity reduction would significantly reduce travel options and connectivity for consumers,” the airline group said.
The Dutch government failed to respond directly to the airlines’ argument and their decision to take legal action. However, it did say it remained committed to reaching its flight reduction target.
“As we are currently facing a potential legal procedure, we cannot at this time respond to the arguments shared by KLM and other parties,” said the Dutch government. “We remain committed to reducing the number of aircraft movements to an expected 440,000 by November 2024.”
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.